Public Comments to the EPA on the proposed OUC Coal Gasification Project; to be delivered at the Timber Creek High  School Tuesday August 30th 2005


A few days ago, while attending the latest meeting of a new "Grassroots" organization called the Central Florida Renewable Energy Society I heard about the OUC Coal Gasification Project.
A link to the official EPA notice is here:   http://www.epa.gov/fedrgstr/EPA-IMPACT/2005/August/Day-11/i15906.htm

OUC needs a new plant to provide for an expected 20 percent growth in  its number of customers. The utility has some key approvals already in  place to build a fourth plant at the Stanton complex.  The 300-megawatt plant -- big enough to light about 30,000 homes --  would be one of a handful of such plants in the world and serve as a  demonstration model of the technology of coal gasification for power  companies around the globe.

While these motives, in and of themselves are very admirable, they unfortunately turn a blind eye to many of the larger social and environmental concerns which will soon have much greater importance and gravity in our evermore so, crowded world.

I like to refer to coal as oil's "Solid Sister".  Meaning, for the most part, that whatever can be gotten by refining petroleum can also be derived from coal.   I'm not sure how much coal will be burned by this plant if it is built, but it must be a very large amount.  They will need $13.1 million for new railroad cars alone!

As it appears to me now, burning fossil fuels to generate electricity in this day and age would be a lot like building steamships to hunt whales at the end of the 19th century.   If we are going to make better use of our precious natural resources, then we must make much greater commitments to using alternative energy first.



About 30 years ago, I had the unique and very fortunate experience of being involved with the premier program of Social Ecology Studies.  It was held at
Goddard College, a small but very progressive school located in northern Vermont.   At that time the entire field of Social Ecology was limited to the summer session at that one school.   Now, through Goddard College and other schools around the world it is possible for someone to obtain a doctorate in it!

Way back then, one of the more contentious issues was what is exactly meant by "Social Ecology".   My guess is that it is still just as contentious today, because it meant different things to different people, which has not changed.   The definition that I like best is, that it is a lot like anthropology.  In that we are studying human beings and how they deal with and interact with their environment.  But instead of it being of them in the distant past, it is of them in the present and future that we are concerned with.   My primary interest in Social Ecology at that time, was specifically for "Alternative Energy".

A couple of weeks ago, I had another unique and very fortunate experience in being able to have attended the ISES Solar World Congress 2005 which was held serendipitously here in
Orlando.   Without a doubt, the most valuable thing I got from it was the "White Paper" Transitioning to a Renewable Energy Future by Donald W.  Aitken, Ph.D..


In the Executive Summary he starts by saying;

This White Paper provides a rationale for effective governmental renewable energy policies worldwide, as well as sufficient information to accelerate effective governmental policies. It is the thesis of this White Paper that a worldwide effort to generate the renewable energy transition must emerge at the top of national and international political agendas, starting now.

In the history of human energy use, the White Paper records that sustainable resources were the sole world supply, even in nascent industrial development well into the 1800s, and that the world will necessarily again have to turn to sustainable resources before the present century is over. The fossil fuel period is therefore an “era”, not an age, and highly limited in time in comparison with the evolution, past and future, of civilizations and societies. Accordingly, it is critical for governments to view what remains of the fossil fuel era as a transition.

The White Paper reveals that policies now in existence, and economic experience gained by many countries to date, should be sufficient stimulation for governments to adopt aggressive long-term actions that can accelerate the widespread applications of renewable energy, and to get on a firm path toward a worldwide “renewable energy transition”, so that 20 % of world electric energy production can come from renewable energy sources by 2020, and 50 % of world primary energy production by 2050. There can be no guarantee this will happen, but the White Paper presents compelling arguments that show it is possible, desirable, and even mandatory.

The window of time during which convenient and affordable fossil energy resources are available to build the new technologies and devices and to power a sustained and orderly final great world energy transition is short – an economic timeline that is far shorter than the time of physical availability of the “conventional” energy resources. The White Paper argues that the attractive economic, environmental, security and reliability benefits of the accelerated use of renewable energy resources should be sufficient to warrant policies that “pull” the changes necessary, avoiding the “push” of the otherwise negative consequences of governmental inaction. There is still time left for this.

The White Paper presents three major conditions that are driving public policy toward a renewable energy transition:
1) newly emerging and better understood environmental constraints;
2) the need to reduce the myriads of risks from easy terrorist targets and from breakdowns in technologies on which societies depend; and
3) the attractiveness of the economic and environmental opportunities that will open during the renewable energy transition.

The renewable energy transition will accelerate as governments discover how much better the renewable energy policies and applications are for economies than the present time- and resource-limited policies and outmoded and unreliable centralized systems for power production and distribution.

Today, it is public policy and political leadership, rather than either technology or economics, that are required to move forward with the widespread application of the renewable energy technologies and methodologies. The technologies and economics will all improve with time, but the White Paper shows that they are sufficiently advanced at present to allow for major penetrations of renewable energy into the mainstream energy and societal infrastructures. Firm goals for penetrations of renewable energy into primary energy and electrical energy production can be set by governments with confidence for the next 20 years and beyond, without resource limitations.

Specifically, with regard to the renewable energy technologies, the White Paper shows the following:

Bioenergy: about 11 % of world primary energy use at present is derived from bioenergy, the only carbon neutral combustible carbon resource, but that is only 18 % of today’s estimated bioenergy potential. Estimates for world bioenergy potential in 2050 average about 450 EJ, which is more than the present total world primary energy demand.  Fuel “costs” for the conventional resources become instead rural economic benefits with bioenergy, producing hundreds of thousands of new jobs and new industries.

Geothermal Energy: geothermal energy has been used to provide heat for human comfort for thousands of years, and to produce electricity for the past 90 years. While geothermal energy is limited to those areas with access to this resource, the size of the resource is huge. Geothermal energy can be a major renewable energy resource for at least 58 countries: thirty-nine countries could be 100 % geothermal powered, with four more at 50 %, five more at 20 %, and eight more at 10 %. Geothermal energy, along with bioenergy, can serve as stabilizing “baseload” resources in networks with the intermittent renewable energy resources.

Wind Power: global wind power capacity exceeded 32,000 MW by the end of 2002, and has been growing at a 32 % rate per year. Utility-scale wind turbines are now in 45 countries. The price of wind-produced electricity is now competitive with new coal-fired power plants, and should continue to reduce to where it will soon be the least expensive of all of the new electricity-producing resources. A goal of 12 % of the world’s electricity demand from wind by 2020 appears to be within reach. So is a goal of 20 % of
Europe’s electricity demand by 2020. This development pace is consistent with the historical pace of development of hydroelectric and nuclear energy. The 20 % penetration goal for the intermittent renewable energy resources is achievable within present utility operations, without requiring energy storage.

Solar Energy: The energy from the sun can be used directly to heat or light buildings, and to heat water, in both developed and developing nations. The sun’s radiant energy can also directly provide very hot water or steam for industrial processes, heat fluids through concentration to temperatures sufficient to produce electricity in thermal-electric generators or to run heat engines directly, and produce electricity through the photo voltaic effect. It can be used directly to enhance public safety, to bring light and the refrigeration of food and medicine to the 1.8 billion people of the world without electricity, and to provide communications to all regions of the world. It can be used to produce fresh water from the seas, to pump water and power irrigation systems, and to detoxify contaminated waters, addressing perhaps the world’s most critical needs for clean water. It can even be used to cook food with solar box cookers, replacing the constant wood foraging that denudes ecosystems and contaminates the air in the dwellings of the poor.

Buildings: in the industrial nations, from 35 % to 40 % of total national primary use of energy is consumed in buildings, a figure which approaches 50 % when taking into account the energy costs of building materials and the infrastructure to serve buildings. Letting the sun shine into buildings in the winter to heat them, and letting
diffused daylight enter the building to displace electric lighting, are both the most efficient and least costly forms of the direct use of solar energy. Data are mounting that demonstrate conclusively enhancements of human performance in day lit buildings, with direct economic and educational benefits that greatly multiply the energy-
efficiency “paybacks”. The integrated design of “climate-responsive” buildings through “whole building” design methods enables major cost savings in actual construction, normally yielding 30 % to 50 % improvement in energy efficiency of new buildings at an average of less than 2 % added construction cost, and sometimes at no extra cost.

Solar Energy Technologies: serious long-range goals for the application of solar domestic water and space heating systems need to be established by all governments, totaling several hundred million square meters of new solar water heating systems worldwide by 2010. A worldwide goal of 100,000 MW of installed concentrating
solar power (CSP) technology by 2025 is also an achievable goal with potentially great long-term benefits.

Photo voltaic (PV) solar electric technology is growing worldwide at an amazing pace, more than doubling every two years. The value of sales in 2002 of about US$ 3.5 billion is projected to grow to more than US$ 27.5 billion by 2012. PV in developed and developing nations alike can enhance local employment, strengthen local economies, improve local environments, increase system and infrastructure reliability, and provide for greater security.  Building-integrated PV systems (BIPV) with modest amounts of storage can provide for continuity of essential governmental and emergency operations, and can help to maintain the safety and integrity of the urban infrastructure in times of crisis. PV applications should be an element of any security planning for cities and urban centers in the world.

The White Paper stresses the importance of governmental policies that can enhance the overall economic productivity of the expenditures for energy, and the great multiplier in the creation of jobs from expenditures for the renewable energy resources rather than for the conventional energy sources. Utilities are not in the job producing business, but governments are, supporting the need for governments to control energy policies and energy resource decisions.

National policies to accelerate the development of the renewable energy resources are outlined, emphasizing that mutually supporting policies are necessary to generate a long-term balanced portfolio of the renewable energy resources. Beginning with important city examples, the discussion moves to national policies, such as setting renewable energy standards with firm percentage goals to be met by definite dates. The specific example of the successful German “feed-in” laws is used to illustrate many of these points.

Market-based incentives are described in the White Paper, to compare with legislated goals and standards, and discussed in terms of effectiveness. It is shown that various voluntary measures, such as paying surcharges for “green power”, can provide important supplements to funding for renewable energy, but that they cannot be sufficient to generate reliable, long-term growth in the renewable energy industries, nor to secure investor confidence. Reliable and consistent governmental policies and support must be the backbone for the accelerated growth of the industries.

It is also shown in this White Paper that the energy market is not “free”, that historical incentives for the conventional energy resources continue even today to bias markets by burying many of the real societal costs of their use. It is  noted that the very methodologies used for estimating “levelized” costs for energy resources are flawed, and that they are not consistent with the more realistic economic methodologies used by modern industries. Taking into account future fuel supply risk and price volatility in net present valuations of energy resource alternatives paints a very different picture, one in which the renewable energy resources are revealed to be competitive or near-competitive at the present time.

Even though this White Paper emphasizes the readiness of the renewable energy technologies and markets to advance the penetration of these resources to significant levels in the world, an important component of any national renewable energy policy should be support for both fundamental and applied R&D, along with cooperation with other nations in R&D activities to enhance the global efficiency of such research. It is both significant and appropriate that the European Commission has agreed to invest for the next five-year period in sustainable energy research an amount that is 20 times the expenditure for the 1997-2001 five-year period.

The White Paper concludes with the presentation of two comprehensive national energy policies to demonstrate the method of integration of various individual strategies and incentives into single, long-range policies with great potential returns. All of those square meters of collectors and hectares of fields capturing solar energy, blades converting the power of the wind, wells delivering the Earth’s thermal energy, and waters delivering the energy of river flows, waves and tides, will displace precious and dwindling fossil fuels and losses of energy from the worldwide phase-out of nuclear power. Sparing the use of fossil fuels for higher economic benefits, or using them in fuel-saving and levelizing “hybrid” relationship with the intermittent renewable energy resources (sun and wind), will contribute to leaner, stronger, safer societies and economies. And, in the process, carbon and other emissions into the atmosphere will be greatly reduced, now as a result of economically attractive new activities, not as expensive environmental penalties.

And Dr. Aitken concludes by saying;
Governments need to set, assure and achieve goals to accomplish simultaneously aggressive efficiency and renewable energy objectives.   The implementation mechanisms for achieving these goals must be a packaged set of mutually supportive and self-consistent policies.  The best policy is a mix of policies, combining long term renewable energy and electricity standards and goals with direct incentive and energy production payments, loan assistance, tax credits, development of tradable market instruments, removal of existing barriers, government leadership by example, and user education.